Larz42 wrote:Funny story, but it seems like a lot of unnecessary work to prove a point.
I second that. He should have continued to motorboat and then dipped when things got old/ too hectic.
If suit was filed thereafter, the motorboatin' SOB would need only cross-claim on several issues and pay nothing by recouping all fees as part of damages.
The present course of action wasted a lot of $ to prove the same point.
It's not a real party until the 15 year old walks in sporting his "gat".