[PD] Gay marriage

bitterchemical · Post by **bitterchemical** » Jul 31 2003 10:08 pm

What do you think?

Does the state have the right to do what Bush wants and Congress is considering? Discuss.

Lori · Post by **Lori** » Aug 1 2003 07:57 am

I think the president has a lot of nerve, daring to tell people who they ought to love and how they ought to live their lives. I read a book something like that, full of ideas I am sure he would agree with...1984, by George Orwell. Next we'll be needing licenses to have children.

Marriage is a custom, not a legal issue. Since legal aspects have been attached to it, people with their own customs ought to be permitted the legal benefits. In this country, one spouse is the custom. However, a visiting royal Muslim family, consisting of one husband and the maximum four wives, would be accorded the same legal respect.
How does the President feel about monogamy? I think he is talking out both sides of his mouth. How does the president feel about marriage? I don't think even he knows...I think someone whacked him upside the head with a Bible and decided for him.
Sorry Mr. President...sprout a pair of balls and chip the ice from your heart.

manny is the man · Post by **manny is the man** » Aug 1 2003 09:35 am

did you see what virgo wrote on the jax board

manus · Post by **manus** » Aug 1 2003 10:30 am

Getting married means nothing if you truly love that person. Love is more powerful that anything in the world and the funny part about it is........ it is not a material thing.

bitterchemical · Post by **bitterchemical** » Aug 1 2003 10:58 am

thanks manny, i hadn't seen that fuckhead's post yet.

manny is the man · Post by **manny is the man** » Aug 1 2003 10:59 am

manus · Post by **manus** » Aug 1 2003 11:10 am

bitterchemical wrote:thanks manny, i hadn't seen that fuckhead's post yet.

Its in Fames now. Check it out. Funny ass shit.

TOY CRUSHER · Post by **TOY CRUSHER** » Aug 1 2003 11:24 am

Lori wrote:I read a book something like that, full of ideas I am sure he would agree with...1984, by George Orwell. Next we'll be needing licenses to have children.

Preppy Raver · Post by **Preppy Raver** » Aug 1 2003 11:28 am

some people should have a license to have childern!

now i dont mean this in a bad way, but damn, little girls and mothers on welfare having babies left and right!

manus · Post by **manus** » Aug 1 2003 11:34 am

Preppy Raver wrote:some people should have a license to have childern!

now i dont mean this in a bad way, but damn, little girls and mothers on welfare having babies left and right!

The only way to stop that is to get on the pill or tubes tied, cause its not like they are going to stop having sex.

Preppy Raver · Post by **Preppy Raver** » Aug 1 2003 11:38 am

i know that, i was metaphorically speaking...but thanks though!

bitterchemical · Post by **bitterchemical** » Aug 1 2003 11:39 am

Preppy Raver wrote:some people should have a license to have childern!

now i dont mean this in a bad way, but damn, little girls and mothers on welfare having babies left and right!

i would agree, more for couples who have lethal or damaging gene combo's, than for sociological reasons.

with the advances (and lack of regulation) involved in fertility treatments, many if not most couples who have the money can force themselves to get pregnant. the problem is, sterility has a purpose, in preventing dangereous gene combinations from being spread. at the least, i think a reproductive assay should be done on anyone attempting to use forced fertility treatments, and if it comes back negetive, the procedures should not be done.

TOY CRUSHER · Post by **TOY CRUSHER** » Aug 1 2003 12:52 pm

bitterchemical wrote:sterility has a purpose, in preventing dangereous gene combinations from being spread. at the least, i think a reproductive assay should be done on anyone attempting to use forced fertility treatments, and if it comes back negetive, the procedures should not be done.

Exactly. It's called "natural selection". I couldn't agree with that more.

MaZen · Post by **MaZen** » Aug 1 2003 02:55 pm

TOY CRUSHER wrote:
bitterchemical wrote:sterility has a purpose, in preventing dangereous gene combinations from being spread. at the least, i think a reproductive assay should be done on anyone attempting to use forced fertility treatments, and if it comes back negetive, the procedures should not be done.
Exactly. It's called "natural selection". I couldn't agree with that more.

Intersting how that works out..The people that can care for children and truely want them, can't have them on their own. The ones that shouldn't ever have them...are blessed with more than they know what to do with.

Dual sex marriages seem like it would help in that aspect. Most gay couples attept to adopt. .....when i was in highschool i did a bill for my youth and government club (debate club..my first year in it)...about same sex marriages. I def think it should be legal. WHY NOT. Seems like some where church and government never seperated. hmm how interesting. Its all paper and numbers anyway. .
......your born (birth certif. social sec. #)
.....you get to drive (another set of numbers and more paper)
.....you graduate (a diploma)
.....you fall in love and make a solid commitment to someone (marriage licence, paper and more numbers)
.....you die (more fucking paper..DEATH CERTIF.)
i'm rambling...but i think most people see this. I don't feel like i need a piece of paper and numbers to feel alive, to travel, to learn, to love or to die.

Maybe i'll just get married and sign that dotted line when a man can give birth.

Lori · Post by **Lori** » Aug 2 2003 09:14 am

When a man gives birth...hey, I wanna know who the father is! Not to mention, there's only one place that little critter is coming out...